American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN (Online): 2378-7031
DOI: 10.46568/2378-7031
When Violence Became a Remedy: The Changing Legitimacy of War in Humanitarian Emergencies
Abstract
Humanitarian assistance remains one of the most significant yet complex concerns facing the contemporary international community. Delivering aid becomes particularly difficult in states affected by armed conflict, where political instability, territorial fragmentation, and competing claims of authority can prevent humanitarian organizations from reaching vulnerable populations. In areas controlled by rebel groups or other non-state actors, aid agencies often confront the difficult question of whether the principle of national sovereignty should limit efforts to protect civilians in urgent need. The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union further reshaped the international political environment, with the United States assuming a dominant role in many humanitarian responses. However, the experience of the 1992 intervention in Somalia, particularly the human and political costs associated with military involvement, exposed the limitations of conventional humanitarian operations. These developments contributed to wider debates over humanitarian intervention and the circumstances under which military action might be justified to address severe human suffering. Consequently, humanitarian crises increasingly became linked to broader questions of international responsibility, human rights, and the role of the global community.
Keywords: Humanitarian Intervention, International Community, Human Rights, Humanitarian Assistance, Non-Governmental Organizations, Sovereignty.