Effect of Metformin Therapy Over Hormone Profile in Newly Diagnosed Polycystic Ovary Syndrome –A Nine Months Randomized Controlled Trial 111
Citation: Effect of Metformin Therapy Over Hormone Profile in Newly Diagnosed Polycystic Ovary Syndrome –A Nine Months Randomized Controlled Trial. American Research Journal of Endocrinology; 1(1): 9-17
Copyright This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder of women with multifactorial causes leading to chronic anovulation associated with androgen excess. It was first described by Stein & Leventhal in 1935 as the commonest endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age leading to menstrual irregularity, which is one of the cardinal clinical features of PCOS.1 Incidence of PCOS in women of reproductive age is reported to be 5 to 10% which is found to be increasing than assumed.2 PCOS is characterized by anovulatory menstrual cycle, infertility, hyperandrogenism thus resembling different metabolic syndromes.3 In 2003 Rotterdam criteria was proposed which requires two of the following characteristics for the diagnosis of PCOS: oligo-ovulation or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries with the exclusion of other etiologies (congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen secreting tumors, Cushing syndrome).4 Women with PCOS may present with multiple manifestation which include cutaneous, reproductive, endocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Cutaneous manifestations including hirsutism, acne and male pattern of baldness are caused by hyperandrogenism. Reproductive manifestations are menstrual dysfunctions like secondary amenorrhea/ oligomenorrhea, infertility, early pregnancy loss and other complication of pregnancy. Metabolic and endocrine abnormalities are increased circulating levels of total and/ or free testosterone, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate (DHEAS), decreased sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), increased insulin level and increased ratio of luteinizing hormone : follicle stimulating hormone (LH/FSH).5 In addition to the clinical presentation, PCOS poses the long term risk of development of gestational diabetes, type 2 DM, frequent first trimester pregnancy loss and increased risk of cardiovascular disease & endometrial cancer.6,7,8 Historically, treatment has been directed at ovulation induction for infertility, oral contraceptive or progestins for menstrual irregularity and antiandrogen for hirsutism.9 This traditional pharmacological therapy for patients with PCOS mainly address the hyperandrogenic state and anovulation, but neglects the associated long time metabolic risk i.e. insulin resistance.
Recently, increasing evidence has shown that the insulin resistance has an important implication in the pathogenesis of PCOS and the use of insulin sensitizing drugs is an effective therapeutic approach. Insulin resistance with resultant hyperinsulinemia, irrespective of excess weight or frank obesity, has been reported in patient with PCOS.10 A growing body of evidence has suggested that hyperinsulinemia contributes to the excess ovarian androgen secretion observed in women with PCOS.11 The increase insulin sensitivity by insulin sensitizers may be of therapeutic value in the management of clinical manifestations of hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenemia.12 The improvement of insulin sensitivity by insulin sensitizers e.g. metformin is now thought to be of pivotal therapeutic value in the management of PCOS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a randomized double blind placebo-controlled study comprised of 80 PCOS patients. Inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 35 years, PCOS diagnosed on the basis of Revised Rotterdam Consensus 2003 criteria. PCOS patients were recruited consecutively who were given either metformin or placebo in a double blind process and were scheduled for five visits within the period of nine months in each subject, whereupon a window period of 14 days was permitted for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and last visit. Women with PCOS were treated with metformin for nine months in a dose of 1500 mg daily in three divided doses. 49 patients completed the visit in which 23 were in placebo and 26 in metformin group. On the other hand, who failed to fulfill the compliance, were dropped. Thus 27 were dropped, among them 14 were in placebo and 13 in metformin group; 4 got pregnant, 3 in placebo and 1in metformin group.
AMH was estimated by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, AMH GEN II ELISA kit (Beckman Coulter, Inc. USA) whereas other hormones (FSH, LH and Testosterone) by immunochemiluminometric assay. Values of AMH were presented as nanograms per milliliters (conversion factor to pmol/l = ng/ml × 7.1). AMH was calculated using kc3 biograph with help of the standard supplied with the kit. QC (quality control) was used in each assay run to assess precision of the assay. Intra-assay CV (co-efficient of variance) was 3.4 to 5.4% and inter-assay CV 4.0 to 5.6% for AMH assay.
All data are processed by the SPSS program (version-22.0). Values are expressed as frequencies or mean ± SD unless mentioned otherwise. At the end of the study, metformin/placebo was unblinded and subjects were divided into two groups: one metformin and another as placebo. Within each group categorical variables (hirsutism, acne, acanthosis nigricans, menstrual irregularity, infertility) were analyzed by using Chi square. Numerical variables (serum AMH, testosterone, progesterone) were analyzed by paired or unpaired t-test as applicable. P-values ≤0.05 were considered as significant.
Randomized double blind placebo-controlled study was done on PCOS to see the effect of metformin for which 80 subjects (age, mean±SD: 23.10±4.30; married/unmarried: 44/36; H/O amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea: 90%; H/O abortion: 25%; H/O infertility: 38.6%). Characteristics of the subject are shown in Table-I. Metformin or placebo were continued for 9 months in each subjects with intermittent follow-up with periods of one month, two months and three months for last two consecutive visits. Comparison of biochemical parameters were done between the baseline findings and that after nine months by paired model of statistical test within the group and unpaired model for between the groups. Table-II shows the baseline clinical characteristics between metformin and placebo groups [metformin vs. placebo, BMI (kg/m2) 26.18±5.44 vs. 25.30±5.32, p = 0.462; WC (cm): 86.90±12.34 vs. 85.88±11.02, p = 0.696; SBP (mmHg): 110.88±11.43 vs.110.88±8.47, p = 1.0; DBP (mmHg): 74.38±8.56 vs.73.75±6.96, p = 0.721; hirsutism: 82.5%vs.85.0%, p = 0.762; acne: 42.5% vs.40.0%, p= 0.820; acanthosis nigricans: 22.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.143]. None of the variables showed any statistical significant difference between the groups. Background hormonal and biochemical profiles (mean±SEM) of the patients are shown in Table-III [metformin vs. placebo, S. prolactin (ng/ml): 14.54±2.78 vs.11.84±1.13, p = 0.373; S.TSH (mIU/L): 2.44±0.20 vs. 2.46±0.22, p = 0.956; S.LH (U/L): 8±0.90 vs. 7.24±0.88, p = 0.547; S. FSH (U/L): 4.75±0.24 vs. 4.61±0.39, p = 0.752; LH/FSH ratio: 1.74±0.18 vs. 2.09±0.33, p = 0.338; S. testosterone (ng/ ml): 8.23±0.62 vs. 8.34±0.46, p = 0.893; S.AMH (ng/ml): 5.19±0.79 vs. 5.21±0.64, p = 0.986; S. progesterone (ng/ml): 1.96±0.56 vs. 1.67±0.51, p = 0.707; fasting blood glucose (mmol/L): 4.67±0.06 vs. 4.8±0.07, p = 0.195; SGPT(U/L): 45.23±2.41 vs. 44.90±2.94, p = 0.729; S. creatinine (mg/dl): 0.79±0.02 vs. 0.80±0.03, p = 0.338]. It was also observed in this aspect that there was no statistical difference between the metformin and placebo groups. Fig-1 depicts changes of hormonal profiles (mean±SD) before and after treatment of metformin [AMH (ng/ml): 6.10±5.68 vs. 8.67±4.27, p<0.003; progesterone (ng/ml):1.55±2.58 vs. 5.16±5.20, ng/ml, p = 0.006; testosterone (ng/ml):8.11±3.98 vs. 5.96±1.72, ng/ml, p = 0.003]. It was found that in metformin group AMH level increased significantly as well as progesterone level whereas testosterone significantly decreased. Hormonal profiles before and after treatment by placebo are shown in Table-IV [AMH (ng/ml): 4.89±3.70 vs 10.54±3.58, p<0.001; testosterone (ng/ml):8.88±3.10 vs. 8.86±3.06, ng/ml, p = 0.989; progesterone (mg/ml)0.94±0.85 vs 0.82±1.34, ng/ml, p = 0.670]. AMH (ng/ml) was increased after nine months whereas testosterone and progesterone unchanged statistically.
Comparison between the metformin and placebo groups for the hormonal profiles at the end point of the study is shown Fig-2. Though in both groups, AMH happened to be increased than baseline it was relatively more increased in the placebo group (8.67±4.27 vs. 10.54±3.58,ng/ml, p = 0.106). However increase of progesterone (5.16±5.20 vs. 0.82±1.33, ng/ml, p<0.001) and reduction of testosterone (5.96±1.71 vs. 8.86±3.09, ng/ml, p<0.001) were statistically significant and comparable between metformin and placebo groups.
Table I. Characteristics of the study population at baseline (n=80)
(Within parenthesis are percentages over column total)
Significant values stand for comparison between metformin and placebo by student t-test and chi-square test
Total dropped cases were = 27, who did not complete study
(metformin = 26, placebo = 23,Primary endpoint due to pregnancy = 4)
m±SD: mean±standard deviation
H/O: history of
*Only married respondents (n = 44)
Table II. Baseline clinical characteristics of the study subjects
(Data were expressed as frequency, percentage, mean±SD)
Independent student t-test was performed to compare between two groups for quantitative data
Chi-square test was performed to compare between two groups for qualitative data
BMI: body mass index
WC: waist circumference
BP: blood pressure
Table III. Baseline hormonal and biochemical profiles of the study patients
Data were expressed as mean±SEM
Independent student t-test was performed to compare between two groups
TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone
LH: luteinizing hormone
FSH: follicle stimulating hormone
AMH: anti-mullerian hormone
Table IV. Level of AMH, testosterone and progesterone before and after treatment in placebo group (n = 23)
Data were expressed as mean±SD
Paired sample t-test was performed to compare within group
AMH = anti-Mullerian hormone