Editor Guidelines

The Editors greatly contribute to the Journal's reputation and consistently improve the Journal values by handling thorough peer review process. It is very important for the editor to decide the accurate reviewer to check the quality of the submission.

We consider Reviewers comments; however, the Editor's decision remains final in manuscript acceptance. Editor's responsibility to provide the decision based on novelty and quality of the article.

Assigning Reviewers

The Editor has to evaluate the manuscripts received from the Editorial office. In exceptional cases where the manuscripts remain outstanding, the Editor can accept at this stage. If an editor needs to reject the article, he should provide valid reasons to reject a manuscript.

Decision Making

The Editor should make an unbiased decision on submitted manuscript, based on comments of the reviewers, and the Editor's own assessment of the manuscript. The Editor should provide any of the following decision.

  • Accept with Major Revision
  • Accept with Minor Revision
  • Accept with no changes
  • Reject

Editor's Contribution to the Journal

The Editor should be active and participate in providing new ideas or suggestions to improve the standards of the Journal.

The Editor need to submit Editorials/manuscripts to release the Journal issues regularly.

The Editor should encourage publication of peer-reviewed research, and technological advances in the path of enlightening new discoveries

The Editor should encourage submission of quality articles to the journal from his colleagues other expertise.

ARJ @ SOCIAL

openaccess

ARJ Tweets